MORE HORSES KILLED BY BLM — Wild Horse Herd Death Rate at 15% at Murderer’s Creek, Oregon Bait and Trap Site

murderers creek wild horses injured  The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.  (i.e. see notes below)

I have listed here 42 DEATHS – 42 Wild Horses that BLM employees and Contractors out of Burns, Oregon (i.e. Murderer’s Creek, Oregon) have killed –

Incompetence? – To say the least — BAD management? — What Management?

This is what most of us experienced Horsemen and Horsewoman are asking, that is, those without an agenda — those without wanting to exploit America’s Wild Horses and want to leave them be — in their Natural Environment, which also happens to be our Public Lands – which there is more than enough room . . .

As those who know Horses, myself Included, these are unacceptable numbers, this death rate percentage I mention here — and we have not begun to explore the Helicopter roundup realms in Oregon, as we are still putting together those highly self-explanatory numbers as well . . .

Here is Reality Folks – Time for BLM and their Bastard Contractors and Supporters to get out of the business of Managing America’s Icon’s — the Wild Horses!

BAIT AND TRAP – Murderer’s Creek, Oregon 47 Wild Horses Killed —

A 15% Death Rate – Murderer’s Creek – between Oct / 2012 thru July / 2014

1. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
2. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
3. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
4. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
5. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
6. Blindness or Eye Abnormality
7. Body Condition: Unable to Maintain or Improve
8. Body Condition: Unable to Maintain or Improve
9. Body Condition: Unable to Maintain or Improve
10. Colic
11. Colic
12. Colic
13. Dangerous
14. Defect: Serious Physical
15. Foaling Complications
16. Fracture/Brain Injury: Head Acute/Sudden
17. Fracture/Spinal Cord: Neck or Back Acute/Sudden
18. Fracture/Spinal Cord: Neck or Back Acute/Sudden
19. Fracture/Spinal Cord: Neck or Back Acute/Sudden
20.Fracture/Spinal Cord: Neck or Back Acute/Sudden
21. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
22. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
23. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
24. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
25.Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
26. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
27. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
28. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
29. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
30. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
31. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
32. Fracture: Leg or Pelvis Acute/Sudden
33. Gelding Complications: Hemorrhage
34. Gelding Complications: Other
35. Gelding Complications: Other
36. Injury: Soft Tissue
37. Other
38. Other
39. Other
40. Other
41. Other
42. Undiagnosed/Unknown
43. Undiagnosed/Unknown
44. Undiagnosed/Unknown
45. Undiagnosed/Unknown
46. Undiagnosed/Unknown
47. Undiagnosed/Unknown: Found dead on pasture

What has been of interest to us all is the types of injuries that happen at this particular Bait and Trap Site . . . Some of these 42 horses were foals, and the Dangerous Horse they describe above, AND IN ACCORD WITH THEIR OWN PAPERWORK, WAS A FOAL CLOSE TO A LITTLE OVER 6 MONTHS OLD AS FAR AS WE CAN TELL.  Dangerous, THEN SHOT?

We are discussing here a 15% Death rate, which is an ongoing situation at Murderer’s Creek.  There is no apparent reasoning provided other than the trapping of Wild Horses; so one of the Supervisors says, with a Howdy-Dooty smile, teeth glowing white, smelling like Ivory soap, with a stench of lie that hangs off his every word.

Let’s keep in mind this is what BLM supporters, AWHPC, Freedom for Horses, Wild Horse Education, and even HSUS state clearly to all, that everything is okay and BLM employees are to be trusted?   I know for a fact they are not, as well as many others, and if this is the type of info that BLM and their supporters are dispersing, then I am sorry, they do not know much about Wild Horses, or ethics, or truth for that matter!

TAXPAYERS HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF BLM AND THEIR SUPPORTERS! AND THAT IS A FACT!  Right here and right now we are discussing a minimum of $47,000 taxpayers paid to have BLM’s unqualified contractors and BLM staff Kill America’s Icons, the Wild Horses from Murderer’s Creek, Oregon!

This is a Death-Toll of15%, and between the dates shown above. . .  we are talking unacceptable situations for the Wild Horses – The question is, are they loading them up on KB’s trucks and taking to Slaughter to Canada and Mexico, then listing them as Dead? – Or are these in fact Dead Wild Horses.  Both Reasons Unacceptable and Criminal!

Reality and Conduct

We have no idea about what is the truth, because the BLM employees simply lie about everything, and has done so for decades now — to include when they moved pioneering families out of their homes along the Rogue River. . . Yes, they gave those families two weeks to leave their homes (even though 99 year leases still in effect and legal) — then two weeks later BLM crews come and bulldozed the homes over, then torched the piles of wood and splinters — BONFIRES OF HOMES.  Families watched, with tears and emotion, their entire lives go up in smoke, their possessions, and their pride.  BLM employees, well known at that time as mobsters.

.What we do know as facs, is that the BLM Supervisory Staff, as well as the private contactors at Murderer’s Creek and in Burns, Oregon, does indeed know personally several individuals that own Kill Buyer trucks and trailers, and the actual Kill Buyer’s personally.  This also includes a couple of well-known self-proclaimed Horses Brokers, and on a personal basis –

We also know, via witnesses, that the BLM Supervisor over the Murderer’s Creek Trap and Bait Site had received a briefcase from a Known KB at that time, and via several witnesses at that location . . . there is more, but will go into that later . . .

An Unacceptable Death Rate

Advocates are extremely concerned at this 15% Death Rate at one Trap and Bait Site at Murderer’s Creek – Criminal behavior? Incompetence?

There exists simply a burden here, to Oregon Taxpayers as well . . . we add this $47,000 paid to the private contractors, and the horses killed — then add another $42,000 from 42 more missing Wild Horses, and surprise-surprise, out of Murderer’s Creek, Oregon, that in accord with paperwork never made it to the Burns corrals after capture.  But you dam well better believe those private contractors got paid for their capture, and had something to do with the disappearance of them all as well.  A KB’s truck and trailer will often take ten, some larger trailers will take twenty wild horses at a time.  This is theft, Grand Larceny, and Fraud in accord with Federal Law — take your pick . . .

How long are we going to tolerate this government agency, this abomination of people that abuse, even kill our American Icon’s on a continuous basis?  Not only that, but in this tragedy we are also looking at $89,000 paid to the contractors and by BLM employees, for their criminal behavior.  As a taxpayer, I feel this is not only wrong, but the criminal behavior should be approached, and arrests made, and BLM employees fired.  After all, enough is enough, and we simply perused a small amount of BLM paperwork and inventory to obtain this information.

Actually, it is not just my opinion here in Oregon about what to do with this situation.  It is a broad and well diversified people in Oregon, and we want honesty in government, not criminals.  And we all want our tax money used for Good, wholesome things, and not pay for criminal behavior or to kill Wild Horses that we all so much enjoy watching on our Public Lands.

By the Way, copies of this as well as much more information is currently making its way to the Justice Department — But myself and others wanted the taxpaying public, the owners of this country, to know what one of our government agencies is up to, and has been for quite some time now . . . Decades now, as a matter of fact.


NOTES:  Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies


Posted by on August 12, 2015 in Uncategorized


Wild Horses, Wildlife, Perception and Ignorance: A Time for Cultural Revolution Here – Notes From the Cascades

Bait trapped horse The politicians and government are simply there to support what American’s want; instead, they constantly reinforce the fact they, and corporations, are first within the order of priority, and must control everything. Their control creates ignorance, as lies and deception cannot develop into anything of reality what so ever, we see it daily now. This country was developed and we all fought for The People and Life here to be the Priority – government and business was to support these endeavors.” – John Cox

Here’s the thing, for people to say they are religious, or spiritual, or academic, or advocate, whatever the case may be, there must exist validity. If any of these terms, vocations are to have validity, that gap between the real and the ideal cannot be so unbridgeable that it all simply becomes pie in the sky. There’s got to be a chance for justice on Earth.

We are not fooling ourselves, or any one else for that matter; as much of what many of us write today, we have become the point of the arrow of social revolution. But with such a bland world currently, where ignorance profoundly has experienced social growth, a social revolution could also mean simply getting back to quasi-normal, or less ignorance and more toward something of a dignified and humane culture.

The process is dependent upon the individual, the contract within themselves so to speak. Thoughts can be mundane, ordinary, or simply workable; or, the process can be extraordinary, enlightened, workable in an abstract way, but in time so tremendously acceptable it indeed becomes an evolutionary act – Zen and the history of the screwdriver, if the written historical form even exists . . . but oh my goodness, the changes that transpired and built off such a tool . . .

With many of us there exists no difference between spiritual practice, political action, animal advocacy, and our ongoing day to day life. One good example that I experience and see daily — Horse people tend to their horses, and those with heart and soul have time to also give toward saving horses. The same with many other groups of people – oddly, none of them have developed the mind-set that so many active groups do day-to-day; there exists today a sub-culture within our society, of those that care-tremendously and yet feel so disconnected.

If this realm, or culture, if all decided to gather together, the numbers alone of this particular sub-set or sub-culture could, and obviously should, become a power where people and animals become the priority, business and corporations secondary and support people-animals endeavors. Yes, revolution is this simple, and only when applied becomes Truly Revolutionary.

Learning from Animals

Is the revolution of this type going to be earth-shattering? It is clear to many, others perhaps not so clear and even non existent; ironically, the answers right to our front. Just as ironic, the answers have been, and continue to be right in front of us all. But we are killing the very animals that we can indeed learn significance from . . . Cohabitate in Life . . . We are all creatures of this planet, all live on this planet, and none superior to the other  . . . Look where superiority gets us!  Look at the destruction of our planet, from our decisions . . .

What was clear for centuries past becomes very clear today. People contribute little to the animal world compared to what animals have contributed to our world, and in reality to our very environment (yet ignored often). Oddly, the disrespect toward animals currently generate suffering, horrific abuse, and death of so many species on a weekly basis that our culture, of ignorance, is placing our very existence into question for any type of future generations to even exist. All wildlife remains an essential element in our society, as well as environmental habitats.

Through all of this there is a light at the end of this tunnel of destruction caused by ignorance. Many today, as Advocates – oddly just as simply as the screw driver appealed toward evolutions of machinery and so many other implements, people concerned with animals and their circumstance, are revolutionary.

These are actions that are needed for America — perhaps why our current government is fighting tooth and nail to avoid such transparent ongoing revolution. As Buck would say, “. . . just let that soak in for a minute or two . . .”

Right now we can appreciate, and even acquire a deeper respect for what animals have given us and remain giving us today – the capacity for enlightenment, to discover our very heart and soul and through this simple act of caring. Looking into the eyes of an animal of any type, we can see ourselves, our virtues, our very soul . . . from then onward we gain a respect, an acknowledged appreciation for the presence of the animal kingdom. In the same pretense, we have also gained a sight into what is wrong today, and surely needs corrected.

The use of drugs on our Wild Horses on our Public Lands, depletes the viability (fact and well referenced in wildlife and ecological history), and opens the door to exploitation of a very limited amount of used-to-be Wild Horses, as an end-product. Breed control has led, most often at such a capacity the Wild Horses are now suffering, to extinctionhistory of our wildlife within today’s environment clear on this ultimate-reality – It will lead to the Extinction of our Wild Horses as well – Shortly.

Animal Non-Profits not of a humane-mindset any longer, but an odd ignorance toward planned exploitation and contrived profits at the sacrifice of wild horses. As well, these same non-profits portray daily the lack of ability or mobility to really grasp the plight the animals are currently suffering – the Wild Horses on Public lands just one of many more examples of our wildlife being exploited, and for several reasons.

This exploitation even to the point of being hunted down and killed (Elk, deer, Cougar, Bear, et al.) — both legally and illegally, and numbers of availability based on false science and bad data gathering — Yes, we are facing many extinctions today of America’s wildlife, based on false reasons of capacity, and favored animals in the wild are nothing more nor less than a narrow scope of species, also to be hunted down and killed — ultimately to make trophies for those of ignorance to do so . . . This priority needs changed, and the quicker the better . . .

The modern social capacity toward ignorance, although, has brought a widening gap between us. The forests and the animal kingdom are over there, and the supposed civilized world over here in the cities and small towns.

Protection in numbers, for people, is the consideration for the cities, but from what? The animal kingdom? Government and municipal government are and remain much more dangerous to people than the animal kingdom — just read the newspapers or watch the news daily. Isn’t perception and propaganda interesting —

Sometimes in accepting the world, the chapter of what animals bring to us as fellow living beings on earth and how we are all connected, is overlooked; an ongoing travesty for sure. The world of intellect does not consider the heart, the soul, or the animals. The shift is the realization that we all grew up in the realms of nature, of animals, of a diversity of natural elements – not just smart-phones, guns, oil companies, abusive agriculture and corporations, and computers . . .

A New Humane Balance of Life is needed

The Circle of Life has always, and remains, very significant with many cultures and societies’, we are not alone within this ideology — A Truth: everything being connected within this circle.  The world is being challenged to find a new balance. Many are looking back, toward the cultures that understood and reflected the facts of “all” on this planet are connected, and all things must be respected – this being a priority.

With this as a priority, all other circumstance fits into place, within continuity if you will, toward a much better life for all that exists on this planet – animal species and environment alike. The ideology of one-supports-the-other independently and yet as a whole – is a reality, and something that can save the human-race from becoming more ignorant than currently exists, which this ignorance will eventually wipe-out the human population on this planet.

Our society has become so bland; it is folding in upon itself — suction. We see cruelty to animals promoted as attrition in order to place food on our tables every morning and evening. That is simply not true – just from the untruth within this situation, many to include myself perceive a burst of energy from those who see it as a wrong, not of attrition nor necessity.

It is those things that will change rapidly; it is simply a matter of time is all, when people are totally fed-up with the lies, the ignorant reasoning, and the forfeiture and sacrifice of all the things that are good, the things in our society that we all hold dear and close to our hearts — replaced by something so ignorantly profound or short-term profit for so few – at the sacrifice of so many.

The revolution is upon us – All is connected on this Earth, and these are the things of importance and priority, and more and more people are realizing this truth – all else will simply come together, and life will mean something once again . . . * * * From the Cascade Mountains to You


Posted by on July 30, 2015 in Uncategorized



moon_horse_by_ileva21-d4dhi8t“The very people we made laws to protect the Wild Horses from, have somehow become the decision makers on the absolute management of our Wild Horses.” — John Cox

It is unfortunate we, as a society, have learned to accept things. Essentially this means we have learned to look the other way. Today many people look the other way in the matters of America’s Wild Horses. To those that do, many other people find their excuses profound — and why join such endeavors as BLM management situations, roundups, or PZP scams on the public and worse, on America’s Wild Horses. All this built on false premise and lies!

Those people supporting the Wild Horse travesty, along with the welfare ranchers and others who take part as well, their excuses given for abusive behavior toward America’s Wild Horses as if it saves them. In reality it does no such thing. In reality it is death to many Wild Horses, then onward to extinction – and just plain wrong. History books will make this clear to all in the future, and will separate those that were Sheeple and followed with tawdry excuses and lies while merrily watching horses go to slaughter or die – compared to those of us who attempt to stop such activity.


Wild Horses are not a designated species, other than being a horse. Horses of this breed mixed with that breed, so we are led to believe, develop a pecking order of priority, of wants, of best horse versus worst horse scenarios, which remain nothing more than perceptions. This is also why we have such difficulty establishing Wild Horse’s as distinct species, in order to protect them. Perceptions very significant, but some perceptions extremely negative, not noteworthy and untrue, as this particular discussion will Show beyond a doubt.

The best examples in specific breeds simply establish conformity (more involved but kept simple within this discussion and counterpoint) to communicate the type of horse an individual may want or own by purchase, and indeed pay the price for the lineage.

Once again perception is everything here; thereby, we have not acquired specific distinctions other than a loose and non-distinct paraphrasing of specific horses and amounts “sold as” defined. Not so ironic, the price of a horse brings about its distinction, its overall use, or indeed the outstanding Priority as a horse . . . a priority to save or discard . . .

Bring up the subject of Wild Horses on Public Lands (non-distinct) – no one quite sure how to explain, but by golly they will tell you all about it in several thousands of words or more, and you will leave even less educated, and often worse, sorry that you even brought the subject up.

Point: Oddly suspect, most welfare ranchers will call Wild Horses worthless and simply promote the slaughter of them all –

Counterpoint: Those knowledgeable about Wild Horses, with no vented monetary or land interest, will be truthful and explain the necessary contribution the Wild Horses make to our Public Lands, and indeed do not consider Wild Horses worthless what so ever.

Now we get into the dangers of the classification as non-distinction, which is other than for commercial value. And here is where we take off into the beyond – suddenly there is such a thing as acceptable animal abuse, an ironic acceptability of deranged methods toward the roundup and slaughter of horses; an almost psychopathic need for aerial roundups or trap and bait of America’s Wild Horses, and the all around distinctive rearrangement of the term “Humane . . .” –

In reality there is no need for these endeavors what so ever – and in reality Humane remains definitive, unchanged, with only perception and those who promote false perceptions agree to any form of acceptable abuse! i.e. BLM, DOI, Welfare Ranchers, WH&B Board, BLM Supporters —

“. . . There is nothing “cowboy” about being smart, and ignorance in perception turns into a very dangerous situation.”

The term I use is “old west ubiquity” – which is an extremely bias belief, a worn out perception of a belief, that what matters to those supposed self-claimed “old western cowboys – ranchers” in what makes-up a good horse is all that matters, and that these “old western cowboys – ranchers” set the standard everyone else should live up to in the matter of horses. This is very wrong and over time we can see how wrong it is, through experience; we can actually see what the problems are and what the remedy or resolution can be.

“One of the problems with Wild Horse Management today by the BLM and WH&B Board, is the fact if you have to lie, generate profound misinformation, or refuse to answer significant questions, then something is wrong. It is not an Advocate problem; it is a Person-telling-the-truth-or-not problem. Is this concept difficult to understand? No, it is not.” — Dan Gregory Fitzgerald, NSA Government Employee Oversight, Retired

A large part of what is wrong in Wild Horse Management today, is directly related to the antiquated and ignorant belief systems, which remain extremely bias, that has been around for to many decades — “old west ubiquity” – sadly our government employee’s ignorant as well, often showing buffoonery and incompetence in the simplest of tasks within any type of Horse Management. Their bias toward Wild Horse Management related to special interests only, remains much more extreme.

Then there are those that exist that know better, and knowledgeable about such things as being “Humane” and being knowledgeable in the matter of Wild Horses – the non-commercial values of such endeavors. We have no special interests or no payroll, nothing but good old fashioned honor, integrity, ethics, and experience at good horse management principles.

The Wild Horse and Burro Act of 1971

Of course the discussion on such matters as truth, ethics, perceptions, and ignorance cannot go further without an all inclusive comment on the WH&B Act of 1971.

Rather than dwell in the legalities, let’s ponder the ideology of why the WH&B Act of 1971 come into creation. The law passed Congress unanimously at that time, with American’s supporting it unanimously as well. Here we also delve into ethics and the truism of the term “Humane” and not the fractured particles of being somewhat Humane via a supposed well-managed application of Acceptable Abuse.

The overall value of the ethical standard of the WH&B Act of 1971 was a truism, and why the Act passed unanimously, was that very few cowboys – ranchers actually knew how to handle, or knew about America’s Wild Horse’s at all, other than their presence on Public Lands — as their continuous ineptitude and scornful bias overlapped any type of common sense or moral standard what so ever.

“Most people who have been placed on the Wild Horse and Burro Board are like-minded in the fact that cattle, sheep and rangeland take precedence as an ultimate priority – the fact and truth is special interest over-rides everything else, and over America’s Wild Horses on Public Lands. There is no diversity on this board what so ever, profound but true – simply a narrow scope of thinking and combined with total ignorance toward their own lack of capacity for judgment; which, by the way has developed no wholesome management paradigms over decades, never has and never will if not changed – after all, aren’t these the very people the WH&B Act of 1971 was ratified for, to protect America’s Wild Horses from? Yes, it was.


American’s, and American institutions in particular, are adept at evasion and denial of suffering. Not only our government but our avenues of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of the daily consumer are all good at looking the other way.

When did the transition of acceptable abuse come about? Some historians tell me around the beginning of the Industrial Era, and the consumerism that supported such endeavors.

Also it was a time when people started to move from their farms and into the cities for employment, and the dream to become rich was so popular back then. While on their farms, they lived off the surrounding country-side, living with nature on a yearly basis. The aspect of their communing with nature on the farm eventually lost upon exit. Such items as horses simply become tools, animate objects for transportation, and maintained within that aspect – not of Humane Reasoning, but of utility and availability.

Respect for nature and wildlife lost, washed away and sanitized by industry. In reality, the coexistence with nature replaced with corporate sales. When we explore the problem of ignorance, we often find the very core root of the problem starting quite simple, with innocent intention – whereas, over time it becomes quite significant, quite dangerous indeed, especially to those animals who joined the industrial work-force, where common abuse within daily management become nothing more than part of the mundane daily chore — and on it goes . . . Innocence Lost . . .

 “Internalized oppression is akin to what Freud calls the “repetition compulsion”: the reflexive impulse to inflict on others the pain that we have suffered.”

The WH&B Act of 1971 was meant to protect the Wild Horses on Public Lands from the ranchers and other people who now populate, underhandedly, Board positions within what is now termed the Wild Horse and Burro Board, who irresponsibly Undermine the WH&B Act of 1971. Many American’s and taxpayer’s think these Board Members should go to jail. This has been ongoing for decades now, and has cost American’s not only a lot in taxpayer money and subsidies, who BLM and WH&B Board members make sure their friends and fellow ranchers receive — but has cost many Wild Horses their life, and disgustedly under unnecessary circumstances; from outright lies mostly, from that Board’s members.

It is then compounded with the fact it was done at taxpayer expense, and taxpayer’s paid in large sums for these board members to make those decisions – irresponsible conduct, and some say even criminal conduct – and yet BLM employees, DOI employees, and others simply turn their heads and look away. Why? Because the perception remains, the Wild Horses worthless, but only to those ranchers and cowboys who are profiting over this particular perspective – Those who know better, and do not accept false-perceptions, and have well-rounded experience with horses, know the Wild Horses have not only a place in American history, as Icons of Positive Values and ethics, but a place in the very hearts and souls of American’s of every generation from the past, to the present, to the future – and for valid reasons.

It is similar to a storyline from an old western, the good-folks (Wild Horses and Advocates and American’s) versus the Shylocks (the BLM, DOI, BLM supporters, Welfare Ranchers, and others). As taxpayer’s, we should all be extremely mad and demand a stop to all of this!”

Not so ironic, it is all quite obvious and rather than look-away, take a look directly at the evidence – for example look at the budgets, look at who benefits from their WH&B Board decisions, look who benefits from the Bureau of Land Management decisions, look who pays for all of this (expenses and subsidies paid out, that some term highly criminal in nature), and then we all become quite knowledgeable. Then look at what the American Taxpayer receives in return for all of this money spent, and Wild Horse lives taken = 0! Had enough yet?


The more knowledgeable people, especially in the matters of Wild Horse Herd Management, state clearly to place the Wild Horses back on Public Lands, and to leave them alone . . . No more expense of Wild Horses lives, no more taxpayer expense . . .

The intrusion here and the mis-perception, is the term Humane being changed to Acceptable Abuse and bad treatment and death of Wild Horses, for false reasoning.

As our society grew, and still grows, Humane Conduct toward animals and humans alike must take priority — a society must grow within a true humane structure in order to experience growth. The fact is the “old west ubiquity” was extremely abusive anyway, and needed to be changed, not admired and cloaked as a necessity for the survival of our culture. That is a lie of paramount deception, creates nothing more than destruction, and has only to do with greed.


Special Note:

[ I recently watched Trail of Tears – A Native American Documentary – It is an understatement I was appalled and disgusted of our then government with the treatment of relocating the Native American’s —

I realized by the 2nd chapter that their redefining the term “Humane” for tolerating and stating acceptable-abusive behavior was used. And the lies abundant in regards to what they told the public.

Why am I mentioning it here – because the same terminology, i.e. necessary roundup, need of land for the incoming population, destroying pertinent and economic priority lands, and a non-represented segment of America, among many others terms, the same.

Government employees, BLM supporters, and other contractors – you should be ashamed of yourselves, you disgusting people! History will define what you people are doing and have done here – make no doubt about that, and it will not be a pleasant or nice history of what you are taking part in . . .




“Nevertheless so profound is our ignorance, and so high our presumption, that we marvel when we hear of the extinction of an organic being; and as we do not see the cause, we invoke cataclysms to desolate the world, or invent laws on the duration of the forms of life!” — Charles Darwin

Although wildlife extinction is a normal part of evolution, human modifications to the planet in the last few centuries, and perhaps even millennia, have greatly accelerated the rate at which extinctions occur

Habitat loss remains the main driver of extinct species, but it may act synergistically (i.e. reproduction-reduction – PZP use for example or hunting under falsified habitat population information) with other drivers such as over harvesting and pollution of habitats, and what is currently ongoing — climate change.

Large-bodied species such as Wild Horses, rare species, and habitat specialists (unique biosphere living) are particularly prone to extinction as a result of rapid human modifications of the planet. Extinctions can disrupt vital ecological processes such as pollination and seed dispersal, leading to cascading losses, ecosystem collapse, and a higher wildlife extinction rate overall.


Agreement that wildlife extinction rates have increased over the past few decades is quite common, and undisputable facts exist. Wildlife extinction is from adverse accelerated habitat; profound wildlife breeding control and reduction methods (for example with PZP, the methodology more popular than being useful, and in reality has no significance other than leading to ultimate extinction); and, global expansion of the human population during the twentieth century.

The major ‘‘systematic drivers’’ of modern species loss are:

  1. Changes in land use (habitat loss combined with degradation and fragmentation);
  2. Overexploitation such as cattle and sheep on Public Lands which are invasive species;
  3. Disease from both invasive species and non-invasive or biosphere and habitat fluctuation creating abnormal virus or germs;
  4. Unorthodox breed-control and minimizing reproductive rates exclusively i.e. America’s Wild Horses on Public Lands (i.e. PZP, et al.);
  5. Inherent inner-structural damage of family bands and herds due to interruption;
  6. Climate change  (global  warming)  connected to increasing concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide and increases in nitrogen deposition;
  7. over-hunting, introduced predators or lack of predators;
  8. diseases, and blatant habitat destruction both human-made and invasive species introduced negligently . . .
  9. BLM erroneous horse counts contributes to “closure rates”, as it is estimated that, e.g., cattle and sheep on Public Lands outnumber the wild horses – 10.6 : 1 ratio, and after discussion find it to be the minimum average, a much higher average, according to scientific estimation and a ratio more in-line with cattle and sheep populations on America’s Public Lands is 38.4 to 1 ratio.

A key-element here:  Ultimately, any phenomena that can cause mortality rates to exceed reproductive-replacement, over a sustained period, cause species extinction.


Some events instantly eliminate all individuals of a particular species, such as an asteroid strike, a massive volcanic eruption, or even a rapid loss of large areas of unique and critical habitat because of deforestation, or invasive species which leads to the actual destruction of habitat, then to species.  Many examples, here are two:

  1. The Rocky Mountain Sheep placed on Mount St. Helen’s months before the mountain erupted, a good example of this area-extinction development.
  1. The introduction in 1996 of PZP within the Wild Horse population on Public Lands, then redefined, upon past use – then used currently to lead the way for Wild Horse population extinction, and promoted under false pretense and use . . .

In reality, many forces contribute toward habitat loss which leads to extinction, in the Wild Horse case — a build up of cattle and sheep on Public Lands, with extreme ratios of cattle and sheep compared to horse population.  This will cause extinction of the wild horse directly, for several reasons. Then we compound the situation with reproductive reduction in breed-controls . . . or what is termed Reduction to Extinction.

In our case scenario here, the BLM not only removes many of America’s Wild Horses, but plans have been discovered, over time, that the BLM, along with the Department of the Interior and the Wild Horse and Burro Board are all, along with many of what is termed Welfare Ranchers and miscellaneous corporations — will be responsible for the absolute extinction of America’s Wild Horses off of America’s Public Lands – despite what American’s want.

The BLM, along with their contractors and special interest groups, manipulate material and data favorable only to these special interest groups. They communicate to the public with lies and innuendo; which, equates to misinformation to the public.

This, in reality, is to promote the liquidation via reproductive-reduction of Wild Horses the extinction process, rather than a population-control process, as promoted, toward longevity of wild horses — which is the outright lie . . . as well as a tremendous amount of taxpayer money spent for such criminal behaviors and conduct – Creating fraudulent budgets based on lies and misinformation is illegal after all . . . and many question why this criminal behavior is ignored. . .

In summation:  BLM and DOI, via Special Interests at taxpayer expense, facilitate the establishment of an invasive  species (cattle and sheep) by using a registered Pesticide (PZP) — given to Wild Horses under the status of “Pest” – and this registered Pesticide agent is used for Reproduction Reduction Process = Extinction, and is also an agent of questionable use and very questionable history due to lack of any quality research methodology.

As a result, any one of these process agents can and does cause a population to dwindle. Ultimately to predispose this same population, in this case America’s Wild Horses, to a zeroed-out population = EXTINCTION!


Irrespective of the reason for a population’s decline from a large to small population size, there often are unusual and detrimental events, causation from low horse population, for example.  Good science combined with quality data gathering and information, and sound translation from that data show us the reasoning for low wild horse herd size:

  1. Due to invasive species i.e. cattle and sheep;
  2. Continuous reduction in horse herd and horse band size due to roundups, bait and trap site roundups;
  3. Stealing or commingled theft (by contractors and government employees et al) of wild horses and taking them directly to slaughter;
  4. As well, the heavy false promotion and awkward at best use of the Registered Pesticide PZP for direct Reproductive Birth-Rate Reduction in the wild horse herd populations over all.

(PZP – A Wildlife Breeding-Control Agent is a pesticide which many try to call a Vaccine in order to persuade others it is okay to use on Wild Horses on Public Lands. with the outright and obvious intent of making it sound harmless;

This term seriously erroneous and PZP is a Registered Pesticide with the EPA, and as an EPA agent stated clearly, “. . . PZP is not a vaccine, as it fulfills no terminology or process elements to qualify . . .”

Promotion toward a mere and wholesome population-control of Wild Horses is misinformation at best — PZP is inconsistent and leads to extinction . . .

*The fact is PZP reduces reproductive rates in America’s Wild Horses – and as good science tells us, creates a decrease in Wild Horse population by lower reproductive-rates in many mammals.

**The fact is PZP speeds-up what is termed a “closure-rate.” When using good science and good research derived from a thorough data base, this equates to Extinction of America’s Wild Horses – Beyond any doubt!

Allee Effect

Although competition among individuals is reduced at low densities and can induce a population rebound, a counter-phenomenon known as the ‘‘Allee effect’’ can also act to draw populations more so toward extinction by (for instance) disrupting behavioral patterns, which depend on numbers (e.g., herd defense against predators; genetics and available learned characteristics, for example to establish firm survival skills from aged horses, et al.); or by genetic threats such as inbreeding depression.

Small populations, where most of the wild horse herds are at currently – very low non-viable or near non-viable numbers per herd/band, if dominated by chance events combined with the Allee effects, are often considered to have dipped below their ‘‘minimum viable population’’ size.

Thereby, debate toward compensatory effect, or the Allee effects due to small herd size no longer is a viable deduction what so ever – due to so many other infringement processes conducted on the wild horses while on their designated lands by Law; also, due to the inconsistent Registered Pesticide PZP throughout its history.

But many researchers and others surmise its use, and believe the inconsistent results were known, and to the effect toward a quasi misinformation campaign to promote the Registered Pesticide as a useful anti-reproductive process for the control of wild horses – or in truth of the matter the process to extinction of America’s wild horses . . .

Yes, the truth is nothing more than a known lie by those who wanted the wild horses destroyed completely in the name of being a nuisance or pest, and with no redeemable characteristics what so ever – this equates to judgments based on unsubstantiated data, which equates to hatred toward wild horses – your tax money being used under false pretense by government agencies catering to special interests!

Thus, once a major population  decline  has  occurred  (from  habitat  loss, overexploitation, or in response to many other possible stressors), an ‘‘extinction vortex’’  of  positive  feedback loops can doom species to extinction, even if the original  threats  have  been  alleviated. Further, many species may take decades to perish following habitat degradation, but with so many stressors the wild horse herds confronted with and attacks on them now weekly, and their low numbers, extinction is eminent.

Although some species may withstand the initial shock of land clearing, factors such as the lack of food resources, breeding sites, et al that disappear, makes populations unviable, and they eventually succumb to extinction as well. This phenomenon evokes the concept of ‘‘living-dead’’ species, or those ‘‘committed to extinction.’’

Categorically right now the America’s Wild Horses are, by many government agencies, supporting as a priority the “Living Dead” paradigm – as seen by the ignoring of public response and completing the tasks of the Stressors outlined above, undaunted. . .

The eventual loss of such species, as wild horses on Public Lands  is referred  to as the ‘‘extinction  debt’’  caused  by  past habitat  loss.  For example, even if net rates can be reduced or even halted, the extinction debt of remnant and secondary lands patches will see the extinction of countless remaining species over this interval.  We can now speak more about the attrition situation, other than the wild horse dilemma, and acknowledge our government’s attempts at ridding America’s entire Public Lands of many more animals, or even a priority toward all wildlife . . .


 Certain  life-history along with behavioral,  morphological,  and physiological characteristics appear to make some species  more  susceptible  than others to the  extinction drivers described above. In general, large-sized species with a restricted distribution that demonstrate habitat specialization tend to be at greater risk of extinction from human’s, more so than other stressor’s within their respective Taxa, especially to processes such as rapid habitat loss combined with reproduction .

Because of their high habitat specificity and/or low population densities, rare species may be more prone to extinction than common species. The size of a species’ range is  also  a  major  determinant of its extinction proneness. Small ranges may make species more vulnerable to stochastic perturbations, even if local abundance is high; for example, proportionally more passerines (perching birds) with relatively small geographic ranges.

Such trends are worrisome because those species with shrinking ranges as a result of adverse human activities become particularly vulnerable to other drivers, such as climate change. Habitat loss also reduces the patch sizes necessary for species requiring large home ranges, making them vulnerable to extinction from a loss of sub-population contentedness, reduced dispersal capacity, and the ensuing lower population viability.

Larger-bodied vertebrates are considered to be more extinction-prone than smaller bodied ones when the threatening process unfolds rapidly or intensely. Indeed, threatened mammals are an order of magnitude heavier than non-threatened ones.  A common explanation for this trend is that body size is inversely correlated with population size, making large-bodied animals less abundant and more vulnerable to chronic Environmental perturbations (while being buffered against short-term environmental fluctuations).

The extinction proneness of large-bodied animals to human activities is further enhanced because of other correlated traits, such as their requirement of large area, retarded food intake, high habitat specificity, and lower reproductive rate.


Beyond a doubt, all of the above lead America’s Wild Horses to Extinction.  And the government employees, contractors, and Registered Pesticide PZP promoters are guilty also . . . despite their ongoing misinformation to the public and taxpayer’s alike.

Those who debate these facts, such as those who make their living accepting grants or government contracts and adhere to what they call acceptable practice, while using the Registered Pesticide PZP on the Wild Horses, also have as much vented interest as do welfare ranchers, BLM, DOI, and corporations who make money off the occasion and off of America’s Public Lands.

The bottom line is they are being subsidized via antiquated laws while doing so, lying and distributing misinformation to the public. The best example is the overly estimated Wild Horse populations on America’s Public Lands and given to the public by BLM . . .

Many questions need to be answered, especially from the BLM, the DOI, and the WH&B Board themselves. These organizations hide the truth, or simply give the public outright misinformation and often lie. The extinction juxtaposition of much of American wildlife, directly involving significant links, for example wolves, cougars, and other predators that provide reforestation and environmental enhancements simply by their inhabiting a particular area, are much less active right now, and nearing extinction as well.  This is becoming more noticeable within our environmental crisis as well, and for many reasons.

But there is one more note of interest to be developed here, that is of expense – how much has the taxpayer paid in order to pave the way in making Wild Horses Extinct – and why, when they can get along well enough on Public Lands, without any problems at all due to the sheer number of land-size compared to wild horse herd size – other than those made up problems and by 100% of those who profit vastly on Taxpayer money, in the billions now yearly, and the Taxpayer receives = 0 (that is Zero Folks) Nothing!


Glossary of Unique Terms American’s and Taxpayers Should Know:

 Allee  effects. These  factors  cause  a  reduction  in  the growth  rate  of  small  populations  as  they  decline  (e.g., via reduced survival or reproductive success).coextinction. Extinction of one species triggers the loss of another species.

extinction debt. This refers to the extinction of species or populations long after habitat alteration. extinction vortex. As populations decline, an insidious mutual reinforcement  occurs  among  biotic and abiotic processes driving population size downward to extinction.

extirpation. This refers to extinction of a population rather than of an entire species.

invasive  species.  These are nonindigenous species introduced to areas outside of their natural range that have become established and have spread.

megafauna. This refers to large-bodied (>44 kg) animals, commonly (but not exclusively) used to refer to the large mammal biota of the Pleistocene.

minimum  viable  population. This is the number of individuals in a population required to have a specified probability of persistence over a given period of time.

*** Ironically, and with the use of up to millions of dollars of taxpayer money over the years, the Wild Horse and Burro Board was developed by a congressionally voted upon (unanimously at that time) Law, to safeguard America’s Wild Horses.

*** Ironically again, this WH&B Board (i.e. contrary directly to Law) indeed does not and has not for quite some time protected the Wild Horses on Public Lands what so ever.

***A perusal of the WH&B Act Law and the WH&B Board decisions (Board Meeting Documents over the years) demonstrate this to be a fact, and in accord with the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of the Interior’s blessing, have indeed spent millions in taxpayer money illegally, as well as violated consistently the Wild Horse and Burro Act – also a unanimously and Congressionally voted upon Law which demonstrated the will of the majority of the American people when done . . .

*** So what started out to be a safeguard for America’s Wild Horses, was corrupted decades ago, and was infiltrated with people from the areas the Wild Horses and Public Lands in question were to be protected “From”!  PROBLEM!

*** Ultimately, and well referenced, the WH&B Board decisions based upon getting rid of, or classified as on the road to Extinction, and via a loosely configured time element, all of America’s Wild Horses taken off of America’s Public Lands – Preferred Methodology = EXTINCTION – conducted with Invasive Species X Reproduction Breed-Control (i.e. PZP-Registered Pesticide)!  THE SCAM!


Brook, Barry W., Navjot S. Sodhi, and Peter K. L. Ng. 2003. Catastrophic  extinctions  follow  deforestation  in  Singapore.  Nature  424:  420–423.

Clavero, Miguel, and Emili Garcia-Berthou. 2005. Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 110.

Dirzo,  Rudolfo,  and  Peter J.  Raven.  2003.  Global  state  of biodiversity and loss. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28: 137–167.

Fagan, William F., and E. E. Holmes. 2006. Quantifying the extinction vortex. Ecology Letters 9: 51–60.

Koh,  Lian  P.,  Robert  R.  Dunn,  Navjot  S.  Sodhi,  Robert K. Colwell,  Heather  C. Procter,  and  Vince  S.  Smith. 2004.  Species  co-extinctions  and  the  biodiversity crisis.  Science 305: 1632–1634.

Pimm,  Stuart  L.,  and  Peter  Raven.  2000.  Extinction  by numbers. Nature 403: 843–845.

Pounds,  J.  Alan,  Martin  R.  Bustamante,  Luis  A.  Coloma,

Jamie A. Consuegra, Michael P. L. Fogden, Pru N. Foster, Enrique  La  Marca,  Karen  L.  Masters,  Andres  MerinoViteri, Robert Puschendorf, Santiago R. Ron, G. Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa,  Christopher  J.  Still,  and  Bruce  E. Young.  2006.  Widespread  amphibian  extinctions  from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439:161–167.

Ricketts, Taylor H., Gretchen C. Daily, Paul R. Ehrlich, and C. D. Michener. 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy  of  Sciences  U.S.A.  34:  12579–12582.

Rosser,  Alison  M.,  and  Sue  A.  Manika.  2002.  Overexploitation  and species  extinctions.  Conservation  Biology  16:  584–586.

Sekercioglu, Cagan H., Gretchen C. Daily, and Paul R. Ehrlich.  2004.  Ecosystem  consequences  of  bird  declines.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A.  101: 18042–18047.

1 Comment

Posted by on June 29, 2015 in Uncategorized


America’s Wild Horses — On the Road To Extinction

6648599037_915af2c4a2_z   “They are all beasts of burden in a sense, ‘ Thoreau once remarked of animals, ‘made to carry some portion of our thoughts.’ Animals are the old language of the imagination; one of the ten thousand tragedies of their disappearance would be a silencing of this speech.”   

How large will be the loss of America’s Wild Horses on America’s Public Lands? Over what time period might that loss unfold? Habitat destruction and breed control is the leading cause of species extinction, and here we can actually see cattle, a distinct overabundance, being the problem on Public lands; which, leads to not only environmental destruction, but wildlife and in particular wild horse extinction!

Generally, many of the species found across large areas of a given habitat are represented, most often anyway, within smaller areas. So we can consider habitat loss initially causes few-extinctions. Then we go to cattle . . . then discover there are so many that the last remnants of Public Lands habitat are essentially being destroyed. Thus, at current rates of habitat destruction, the common belief is the peak of extinctions should not occur for decades – Unfortunately, what does exist is an uneven, highly clumped, distribution of vulnerable species over America’s public land surface. Within these ‘biodiversity hotspots (HMA’s in the matter of this discussion), habitats are already disproportionately reduced.

Wild Horses are in danger of becoming extinct!

Conservatively, there are about seven million species of animals — a definition encompassing most organisms that would be generally recognized as plants or animals but excluding bacteria, for instance — about 85% are terrestrial – wild horses such a small percentage, yet blamed for so much “occurrence” on Public Lands – outright lies actually, to defend the over abundance of cattle and other grazing livestock on Public Lands.

Humanity is rapidly destroying habitats that are most species-rich.

To convert habitat loss to species loss, the principles of island ecology (HMA’s being an island for example within this paradigm of explanation) are applied to the terrestrial ‘islands’ that remain in a ‘sea’ of converted land. The relationship between number of species and island area is nonlinear, and from this one can predict how many species should become extinct as the size of the islands shrinks. These doomed species do not disappear immediately, however.

How does one go about calculating the rate of species extinctions from habitat fragments? There have been only a few such estimates, but projections based on a species survivorship curve with a half-life of roughly 50 years, which seems reasonable. Combining the rate of habitat loss, the species-to-area relationship and the survivorship curve gives us a crude extinction curve. From this, we would expect that current extinction rates should be modest — on the order of a thousand species per decade, per million species – but the human-induced, for example here PZP and other breeding controls upon a deficient genetics availability, and special interests toward public lands given a priority . . . Note: Also due to roundups, taking to slaughter mostly stallions, mares disappearing from government corrals in total, and the use of a pesticide PZP which interrupts dynamic herd life and creates misaligned survivorship attributes and family / band disharmony – yes, destruction of the herd dynamics in total —

. . . i.e. many horse bands and herds, the extinction percentage increases 100-fold, and quickens the process to eventually a shorter-time-span of reaction-to-action curve – or extinction within just a few years . . .

The Wild Horses on Public lands is foremost in this matter, as well as wolves, bears, and cougars, as being destroyed — apparently a priority for the ignorant, the politicians that feed upon fear and hate, and those who simply follow such ravings – which are nothing more than distorted and disgusting lies brought about by Special Interest groups and lunatics.

Because the species–area curve is non-linear, the clearing to date (or the overwhelming destruction of Public Lands from cattle) of much of America’s Public Lands, are predicted to eliminate 42% of the species that they contain (some scientists predict much higher numbers as well as much faster). The time delays before extinction mean that many more species should be ‘threatened’ than have already become extinct; that is, they are thought likely to become extinct in the wild in the medium-term future. For example with the elimination of wild horses, wolves, cougars, et al., at least 12% of all plants and 11% of all birds will come into this category as well.

Of course, more cattle onto Public Lands x2 would eliminate the other 85% of species that they contain. The extinction curve should accelerate rapidly to a peak by a decade or two if the rate of livestock increase and destruction of Public Lands remains constant. But it will be upon us sooner if that rate increases as it has been for a few years now — as seems probable.

Oddly Beef remains at 28% product thrown away (not consumed), with 4% thrown away in commercial process, and another 7% lost in transport – Yes, we apparently have an over-abundance of beef in America . . .

Once the extinction peak has passed, the extinction curve declines, perhaps into the twenty-second century as species are lost from the remaining fragments of habitat. The relative height of the peak depends critically on the amount of habitat that remains. A value of 5% of remaining habitat would protect about 50% of all the Public Lands species; smaller percentages would lead to smaller estimates of surviving species.

Habitat destruction areas remain blatantly obvious — Species found only within the areas are themselves destroyed, then eliminated, just as the habitat around them.

One observation interesting, when we considerer HMA’s within a biological paradigm – whereby, species with small ranges are typically scarcer within their ranges than are more widely distributed species, making them yet more vulnerable.

Consequently, even random destruction would create centers of extinction that match the concentrations of small-ranged species — the hotspots. So the ideology of the HMA’s on Public Lands, when first developed were very protective areas, but when manipulated, in this case for Special Interests, these HMA’s become burdensome, even dangerous to the Wild Horses as well as other animals moving toward extinction . . . Look at the term Feral once out of an HMA – a term changed with the WH&B Act to accommodate welfare ranching is all . . .

Worse, however, the HMA’s destruction, as it becomes obvious through consistency, may not have been random at all — rather malevolent. In the HMA areas designated as Wild Horse Safety Zones basically, cattle, rather than Wild Horses become the majority influence upon the Public Lands areas just by sheer numbers alone; only 12% of the original primary vegetation remains within many of the cattle grazing permit areas, compared with about 50% Public Lands as a whole.

Ironically, even within those HMA’s, the areas richest in endemic plant species — species that are found there and only there and only cattle graze and horses do not graze — have proportionately the least remaining vegetation and the smallest areas currently protected.

Applying the species–area relationship to the individual hotspots gives the prediction that 18% of all their species will eventually become extinct if all of the remaining habitats within HMA’s were quickly protected. These HMA’s, deductively, would eventually lose about 40% of all their species.

All of these projections ignore other effects on biodiversity, such as the possibly adverse impact of global warming, and further introduction of more alien species, for example sheep or goats, which is a well-documented cause of extinction of native species as well. Elk, for example, have obtained a virus from Goats feces that are fatal to Elk, et al and the virus transmitted through other infected Elk . . . Yet Cougar and Wolves blamed for Elk destruction – demonstrates beyond a doubt the iron-clad grip of lies and ignorance within our management of wildlife today . . .


Unless there is immediate action to salvage the remaining and currently unprotected HMA’s and Wild Horses and their areas, the species losses will more than double. When this happens the Wild Horses will be Extinct – NONE LEFT!

There is, however, a glimmer of light in this gloomy picture. High densities of small-ranged species make many species vulnerable to extinction. But equally this pattern allows both minds and budgets to be concentrated on the prevention of nature’s untimely end. Protecting them is necessary, but not sufficient – consider they are supposedly protected currently, but that is the lie of all lies – as Wild Horses are not protected at all!

Unless we as a civilization start considering the “truth” rather than lies of convenience for the wealthy and special interests, we will see not only wild horses become extinct, but many, many other wildlife as well as many other environments / biospheres – Conclusively, ignorance is not the path toward humane reasoning – rather, truth is the pathway to sound judgment, good management, and prolific living circumstances in America and abroad . . .

And need I say, the ability to walk out into nature, into areas with wild life, horses, predators and everything we dream about that exits, and actually pause for a moment and see them alive, in their habitat – being as one – with nature . . .



Myers, N. , Mittermeier, R. A. , Mittermeier, C. G. , da Fonseca, G. A. B.& Kent, J. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

May, R. M. in Nature and Human Society (ed. Raven, P. H.) (Natl Acad. Sci. Press, Washington DC, 2000).

Raven, P. H. (ed.) Research Priorities in Tropical Biology (Natl Acad. Sci. Press, Washington DC, 1980).

Skole, D. & Tucker, C. J. Science 260, 1905–1910 (1993). |

Nepstead, D. C. et al. Nature 398, 505–508 (1999).

Cochrane, M. A. et al. Science 284, 1832– 1835 (1999).

Brooks, T. M. , Pimm, S. L. & Collar, N. J. Conserv. Biol. 11, 382– 384 (1997).

Brooks, T. M. , Pimm, S. L. & Oyugi, J. O. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1140– 1150 (1999).

Pimm, S. L. , Russell, G. J. , Gittleman, J. L. & Brooks, T. M. Science 269, 347–350 ( 1995).

Walter, K. S. & Gillett, H. J. IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1998).

Collar, N. J. , Crosby, M. J. & Stattersfield, A. J. Birds to Watch 2 (Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington DC, 1994).

McAllister, D. , Schueler, F. W. , Roberts C. M. & Hawkins, J. P. in Advances in Mapping the Diversity of Nature (ed. Miller, R.) 155–175 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1994).

Evidence of rapid change in genetic structure and diversity during range expansion in a recovering large terrestrial carnivore Proc R Soc B 22 May 2015: 20150092.

Evolving through day and night: origin and diversification of activity pattern in modern primates Behav Ecol 1 May 2015: 789-796.

Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 14 April 2015: 4531-4540.

Towards a general framework for predicting threat status of data-deficient species from phylogenetic, spatial and environmental information Phil Trans R Soc B 19 February 2015: 20140016.

Effects of logging, hunting, and forest fragment size on physiological stress levels of two sympatric ateline primates in Colombia Conservation Physiology 28 October 2014: cot031.

Collapse of an ecological network in Ancient Egypt Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7 October 2014: 14472-14477.

Phylogenetic signal in extinction selectivity in Devonian terebratulide brachiopods Paleobiology 1 September 2014: 675-692.

Predictors of contraction and expansion of area of occupancy for British birds Proc R Soc B 7 July 2014: 20140744.

Rodents of the Caribbean: origin and diversification of hutias unravelled by next-generation museomics Biol Lett 1 July 2014: 20140266.

Low functional redundancy among mammalian browsers in regulating an encroaching shrub (Solanum campylacanthum) in African savannah Proc R Soc B 22 June 2014: 20140390.

Drivers of extinction risk in African mammals: the interplay of distribution state, human pressure, conservation response and species biology Phil Trans R Soc B 26 May 2014: 20130198.

The evolutionary reality of higher taxa in mammals Proc R Soc B 22 May 2014: 20132750.

Declines in large wildlife increase landscape-level prevalence of rodent-borne disease in Africa Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 13 May 2014: 7036-7041.

Ecological correlates of vulnerability to fragmentation among Afrotropical terrestrial small mammals in northeast Tanzania J Mammal 15 April 2014: 269-275.

Predation selectively culls medium-sized species from island mammal faunas Biol Lett 1 April 2014: 20131066.

Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores Science 10 January 2014: 1241484.

Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays elife 1 January 2014: e00590.

Phylogenetic correlates of extinction risk in mammals: species in older lineages are not at greater risk Proc R Soc B 3 July 2013: 20131092.

Traits, trees and taxa: global dimensions of biodiversity in mammals Proc R Soc B 22 December 2012: 4997-5003.

Climatic backdrop to the terminal Pleistocene extinction of North American mammals Geology 1 November 2012: 1023-1026.

Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns Phil Trans R Soc B 19 October 2012: 2814-2827.

Parasite invasion following host reintroduction: a case study of Yellowstone’s wolves Phil Trans R Soc B 19 October 2012: 2840-2851.

Reconstructing past species assemblages reveals the changing patterns and drivers of extinction through time Proc R Soc B 7 October 2012: 4024-4032.

Life history predicts risk of species decline in a stochastic world Proc R Soc B 7 July 2012: 2691-2697.

Habitat tracking, stasis and survival in Neogene large mammals Biol Lett 23 February 2012: 64-66.

The changing fates of the world’s mammals Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2598-2610.

Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2670-2680.

Reconciling global mammal prioritization schemes into a strategy Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2722-2728.

The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2591-2597.

Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2642-2651.

Mapping and navigating mammalian conservation: from analysis to action Phil Trans R Soc B 27 September 2011: 2712-2721.

The ghosts of mammals past: biological and geographical patterns of global mammalian extinction across the Holocene Phil Trans R Soc B 12 September 2011: 2564-2576.

Ecology and evolution of mammalian biodiversity Phil Trans R Soc B 12 September 2011: 2451-2461.

Predicting how populations decline to extinction Phil Trans R Soc B 12 September 2011: 2577-2586.

Phylogenetic conservatism of environmental niches in mammals Proc R Soc B 7 August 2011: 2384-2391.

Rarity as a life-history correlate in Dudleya (Crassulaceae) Am. J. Bot. 1 July 2011: 1104-1112.

Correlates of Vertebrate Extinction Risk in Canada BioScience 1 July 2011: 538-549.

Unexpected patterns of fisheries collapse in the world’s oceans Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17 May 2011: 8317-8322.

Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science Proc R Soc B 7 May 2011: 1329-1338.

The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios Biol Lett 23 April 2011: 312-315.

Primate extinction risk and historical patterns of speciation and extinction in relation to body mass Proc R Soc B 22 April 2011: 1256-1263.

Correlates of rediscovery and the detectability of extinction in mammals Proc R Soc B 7 April 2011: 1090-1097.

Beyond Predictions: Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate Science 1 April 2011: 53-58.

Bird population trends are linearly affected by climate change along species thermal ranges Proc R Soc B 7 December 2010: 3601-3608.

Quantitative Traits and Diversification Syst Biol 1 December 2010: 619-633.

Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning Phil Trans R Soc B 27 November 2010: 3743-3751.

Phylogenetic diversity does not capture body size variation at risk in the world’s mammals Proc R Soc B 22 August 2010: 2435-2441.

Extreme contagion in global habitat clearance Proc R Soc B 7 April 2010: 1081-1085.

World System, Anthropogenic, and Ecological Threats to Bird and Mammal Species: A Structural Equation Analysis of Biodiversity Loss Organization Environment 1 March 2010: 3-31.

Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 30 June 2009: 10702-10705.

Life on the edge: carnivore body size variation is all over the place Proc R Soc B 22 April 2009: 1469-1476.

High variability in patterns of population decline: the importance of local processes in species extinctions Proc R Soc B 7 January 2009: 63-69.

The Status of the World’s Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge Science 10 October 2008: 225-230.

Phylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12 August 2008: 11556-11563.

The Evolution and Distribution of Species Body Size Science 18 July 2008: 399-401.

A Significant Upward Shift in Plant Species Optimum Elevation During the 20th Century Science 27 June 2008: 1768-1771.

The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals Proc R Soc B 22 June 2008: 1441-1448.

Higher origination and extinction rates in larger mammals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 22 April 2008: 6097-6102.

The island rule: made to be broken? Proc R Soc B 22 January 2008: 141-148.

Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 14 August 2007: 13390-13395.

Selective extinction of late Neogene bivalves on the temperate Pacific coast of South America Paleobiology 1 June 2007: 455-468.

Late Holocene extinction of Puerto Rican native land mammals Biol Lett 22 April 2007: 193-196.

Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas Approach for Effective Conservation Planning BioScience 1 March 2007: 256-261.

Early Penguin Fossils, Plus Mitochondrial Genomes, Calibrate Avian Evolution Mol Biol Evol 1 June 2006: 1144-1155.

Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 14 March 2006: 4157-4161.


Posted by on June 23, 2015 in Uncategorized


Wild Horse Herd Advocates versus BLM and PZP Supporters Who Want to Liquidate America’s Wild Horses

cascade mtn pasture    “Conservation is getting nowhere because it is incompatible with our Abrahamic concept of land. We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” — Aldo Leopold

Interesting is the fact that when we discuss the subject of Wild Horses on Public Lands, and their rights to be there, we discover surprising results. What we discover is that government agencies, the Department of the Interior as well as its subordinate agency, the Bureau of Land Management — simply ignore Law.

Ironic, since we consider ourselves to be a Nation of Laws. This ideology is what creates our social-civility as well as humane interactions with others and conduct through our life. These two agencies mentioned here, indeed ignore Congressional mandates that limit, and even prohibit particular management situations of America’s Wild Horses. We can determine from this that indeed, it prohibits the humane and even the ethical treatment of our nation’s Wild Horse Herds, favoring commercialism, the placement of too many cattle onto Public Lands, only for short term profits instead. And yet . . .

Laws directly related to humane and ethical conduct

Recently, the profound interest and use of PZP on America’s Wild Horses, is a fact of misinterpretation as well as misinformation leading to such a drastic measure. The misleading and false information that we have only “limited options” and that such a drastic measure as unorthodox breeding-control is acceptable remains troublesome to many. Lies and bad conduct, mixed with government intrusion upon America’s wild life often is of unscrupulous, certainly debatable, and by many considered mismanagement.

No options? Really? Within a profound context, and simply a light perusal of our laws governing America’s Public Lands, and that includes America’s Wild Horses, we easily locate a chest full with good and robust options for the correct management of our Wild Horses as well as our Public Lands.

Not so ironic, all we have to do is go by several laws already established to manage our Public Lands, which indeed creates diversity as well – I mention this as when we discuss Public Lands, the discussion actually centers around this same diversity of use. When knowledgeable of the subject, yes combating ignorance at high levels of government always an extraordinary experience to say the least, we find many laws quite compatible with not only Public Land Management usage, diversity, but quite receptive to and compatible with Wild Life, to include Wild Horses.

In reality that the lands and resources managed by the Bureau of Land Management can best be—and must be—sustainably managed for the American people under the conservation mandate set forth in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). Other Laws do exist, and support one another within this same capacity, i.e. NEPA, the Taylor Grazing Act, and so forth . . . and very similar is sustainability and biodiversity methodology and putting ideology toward common sense solutions and workable resolutions.

The Multiple Use and Sustained Yield direction given within FLPMA requires government agencies to be competent, objective, restrain themselves toward professional management (compared to current and unsatisfactory criminal behavior and special interest only endeavors), and to work with well informed responsible public land users.  It involves a multitude of resources, uses, and issues perhaps toward equitable resolution, all with major environmental, social and economic consequences . . .

Why is there conflict? The major cause is the misinterpretation of Laws that already exist. The attempts to misinform the American Taxpaying Public, then base pertinent decisions on this misinformation, conclusively generates not only bad management, but spending of taxpayer money, pretty much wasted in total – one can say BLM employees irresponsibly frivolous with so much taxpayer money.

FLPMA, for example, has set forth four broad principles, which we all believe should guide BLM.  These four principles: Renewability, Adaptability, Stewardship, and Equity, if diligently adhered to in the policy, during the development of plans, and daily on-the-ground decision making in conformity with the FLPMA mandate, can precisely result in the lands and resources of Public Lands being truly sustainable.

Misinformation and disruptive special interest priorities have made void these very precise principles and, least we not forget, Law; thereby, we can say this government agency, the BLM, has indeed ignored the law, favoring short-term profit over good management.

There is criminal behavior involved in the ignoring of this law as well, when we consider budgets and procurement policies set aside, in particular from fraudulent information in the matters of decisions to provide financing for such knowingly misguided and misinformed conduct. One has got to wonder about PZP, and if a thorough research of the drug, a pesticide, would have been enough for the approval to responsibly Procure using taxpayer money. Evidence shows it was procured, despite the many regulatory situations leading to Procurement that were indeed ignored, or even waived (?) — the situation to purchase violated not only regulatory situations, but Laws as well, both in Procurement and in FLPMA – there is no Long-Term studies available (as noted in the EPA application) that are applicable to the pesticide safety within such environments as Public Lands, or any environmental circumstances other than captivity . . . for that matter. This is very serious within itself.

Then we can also go to the very real situation of Environmental Assessments, for example, are not in accord with FLPMA or the intent what so ever – to manage Public Lands appropriately and by law. Further perusal of such items as EA’s or the use of PZP by a government agency, and we also discover several Procurement regulatory situations as well as Laws broken . . . fraudulent behavior, which is nothing more than to supply a government agency with false or misleading information to obtain taxpayer money.

Defining Multiple Use

“The term “multiple use” means the management of the public lands and their various resource values so that they are utilized in the combination that will best meet the present and future needs of the American people; making the most judicious use of the land for some or all of these resources or related services over areas large enough to provide sufficient latitude for periodic adjustments in use to conform to changing needs and conditions; the use of some land for less than all of the resources; a combination of balanced and diverse resource uses that takes into account the long-term needs of future generations for renewable and nonrenewable resources, including, but not limited to, recreation, range, timber, minerals, watershed, wildlife and fish, and natural scenic, scientific and historical values; and harmonious and coordinated management of the various resources without permanent impairment of the productivity of the land and the quality of the environment with consideration being given to the relative values of the resources and not necessarily to the combination of uses that will give the greatest economic return or the greatest unit output.

The term “sustained yield” means the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high-level annual or regular periodic output of the various renewable resources of the public lands consistent with multiple use.”

It is simply time for Ethical Ingenuity and Behavior

Aldo Leopold wrote brilliantly about what is needed to achieve an ethical relationship with land.  What stewardship requires, he pointed out is an intense consciousness of land. His concept of a “land ethic” is undeniably necessary for us to achieve sustainability for our public lands and resources.  What we all must do, he said, is to, “Examine each question in terms of what is ethically and esthetically right, as well as what is economically expedient.  A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community.  It is wrong when it tends otherwise.”

Sustainable development balance is relatively easy de novo, but what happens when sustainable management decisions negatively impact the expectations and benefits deriving from precedent social and economic values and uses of public lands and resources?

The answer to that question usually involves bureaucratic mandates, political trumpery and litigation.  The principle of equity means that sustainability for the public lands can not come about overnight, rather it requires a fair and orderly process over sufficient time to reasonably adjust historical expectations and accommodate the social and economic changes concomitant with that adjustment.  This will require longer term thinking than public land agencies usually apply (unfortunately never apparently exceeding four years).

A very strong reality, the fact that BLM conduct should be predicated in accord with law, rather than ignoring and generating questionable situations and many situations even contrary to law, would make the Public Lands landscape superior just from attritional aspects – basically doing the right things to manage our Public Lands . . .

By the same token, the sustainability principle of equity requires adequate reimbursement in support of Public Land Management in return for the profits and benefits made possible through the use of those lands and public resources.  This process must account for and assure to the Public Lands appropriate reimbursement for the external costs of public land and resource uses.

Addressing this principle will require a change in historic laws and policies such as the Mining Law of 1872 and grazing fees where a responsible market value of the resources taken is not presently returned to the public to pay the costs of Public Land Management. These factors also control the usage, rather than random use and unorthodox welfare ranching practice of receiving subsidies for nothing, other than high-profits – the American Taxpayer receives nothing (zero) even though paying these high subsidies to welfare ranchers where they purchase planes, new RV’s, Boats, their kids to college, mansions, pools, and we are stuck with their bills.

Biodiversity — Sustainability

Biodiversity can simply be defined as the variation of life at a given site or ecosystem. However, it is through this diversity that natural systems adapt, evolve, and thrive. This link is so strong that the term biodiversity is regarded as synonymous with ecosystem health. Diverse ecosystems usually have “increased stability, increased productivity, and resistance to invasion and other disturbances.” It is these features that make biodiversity desirable within a given biological community/biome. Most importantly, biodiversity holds enormous value for the entire planet!

Reality within Conclusion

Many of us find it disturbing that DOI / BLM misinterpret, and on many occasions even ignore America’s Laws in regard to Public Lands Management. The astounding fact is the BLM is a cirrupt government agency, where they represent commercialist endeavors, and to hell with all else – and that includes human and wildlife – the ethics and morals of this government agency can be well-defined as — Having None!

The PZP situation, ignoring of Environmental Assessments, taxpayers covering the cost of horses being stolen from BLM inventory and sent to slaughter, the corrupt Welfare Ranching Program, and on and on. . . Illegal? Absolutely! Being done? Yes, and well confirmed by not only observation and witnesses, but BLM’s own government paperwork. Can Public Lands survive? Only if the laws, policy, and regulatory aspects of land management, already in place and perfectly functional, are used.

The fact is the BLM is the most litigated government agency in American History – not because of land-litigations, but because the BLM ignores current laws and policies they are directed to obey. Restructuring and ridding the BLM of many current employees, many criminals, can indeed make it a superior agency – but the way it is now, it is absurd and a waste of taxpayer money – Wild Horses depend on us, just as our environment – and nothing can survive the ever present and current criminal behavior that exists right now, and within the BLM / DOI.

FLPMA PDF Document —

Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (PDF)

O&C Lands Act of 1937 (PDF)

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (PDF)

Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (PDF)

Reauthorized Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (PDF)

Payment Information

Omnibus Public Land Management Act (Public Law 111-11) (PDF)

General Mining Laws (overview only, actual legislation in the future)

Mineral Leasing Act and Amendments (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) (PDF)

The Federal Land Transfer Facilitation Act (P.L. 106-248) (PDF)

The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971, as amended through 1/2006 (PDF)

Cultural/Historic Protection and Preservation Acts

Fee System for Commercial Filming Activities on Federal land (PDF)

See Final Rule 43 CFR Parts 3000, 3150, 3200, 3500, 3730, 3740, 3810, and 3830–Minerals Management:  Adjustment of Cost Recovery, 9/5/07, Federal Register (72 FR 50882-50889)

Leopold, Aldo, “A Sand County Almanac.”  Oxford University Press. 1949.

The Tragedy of the Commons is a dilemma in which multiple individuals acting independently in their own self interest can ultimately destroy a shared resource even where it is clear that it is not in anyone’s long term interest for this to happen.  (Hardin, Garrett,

“The Tragedy of the Commons.”  Science. 1968.  Wikipedia.) & tabid=1052&language=en-US & tabid=1052&language=en-US, pg.18


Posted by on April 17, 2015 in Uncategorized


Death to America’s Wild Horses: Public Lands at the Crossroad and Time For Change

say no to blm

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

American’s, the taxpaying public, needs to start looking at – and understanding what the problems are, existing right now on our Public Lands. Ignoring such a large segment of our lands, and the management conducted by the Bureau of Land Management (i.e. BLM), has led to nothing less than criminality and single-purpose destruction by industrial and corporate entities – who indeed remain untrustworthy and even irresponsible toward America’s needs, taxpayer dollars, America’s wild horses, and Public Lands.

Public Lands, or what is termed “The Smell of Money” – diversity, mainly Special Interest and Lobby Groups, who fulfill their needs of high-profit methodology only. The sacrifice of our Public Lands, and the ever present and extensive destruction, both to land and wildlife, quite costly, and with taxpayers having no idea they subsidize this destruction daily — in the $-billions of dollars yearly.

The GAO (i.e. Government Accountability Office) states in several reports it costs the American Taxpayer $450 million yearly just to administer Welfare Ranching and the BLM Grazing Permit program – this is a program for ranchers to graze their cattle on Public Lands. Subsidies for ranchers and corporations on Public Lands and on a yearly basis, are given directly — $-millions of dollars more.

Ironically, the demand by these Welfare Rancher’s to remove Wild Horses from Public Lands, which also cost millions of dollars more, and on a yearly basis to complete, certainly compound the Public Lands expenses tremendously; although, if the Wild Horses left alone, would cost American Taxpayer’s next to nothing.

The Bureau of Land Management, or what some term as a government agency that is in reality a Special Interest and Corporate Clone, ignores Federal Law and legislation. Instead this Public Lands Management oversight agency ignores its legislative purpose of managing for multi-purpose use, then simply segments into Special-Interest use only – while ignoring ethics and actual-reality and honest Stewardship.

By the way, and certainly not to be ignored, it is of paramount reasoning for taxpayers to subsidize within a budget approved process, these government agencies – the BLM and DOI, with the use of taxpayer money entirely. It is time to question this financing as well, and the implications as to why explained within the context below – a few reasons of many, many more that exist. . .

Wild Horses on Public Lands

The BLM ignores the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (WFRHBA) which provides protections to wild horses and burros on lands where they existed in 1971; as well as FLPMA, Taylor Grazing Act, NEPA, and other laws that involve protections of our Public Lands that directly prohibit destruction or abuse by ranchers and industry. They permanently removed, and continue at a costly price, wild horses and/or burros from approximately 22.2 million acres, and blame the wild horses for the destruction. Ridiculous? Absolutely! Founded on Fact? Not at all, and none exists!

The BLM continues to justify these decisions to “zero-out” herds based on pure Non-Fact. This is accomplished, actually by lies, now obvious to all involved, and reasoning why there exists no transparency at all (as discussed further):

1. checkerboard (private/public) land ownership;

2. a lack of critical resources required to sustain wild horse and/or burro populations (i.e., water, food, space, cover);

3. land transfers;

4. substantial conflict with other resource values; legal decisions or for other reasons.

But the situations here compounded, and disastrous to America’s Wild Horse Herds . . . “The capture, handling, and transportation process inherent to wild horse removals has destroyed wild horse bands, disrupted social dynamics of wild populations, and led to injuries and deaths of captured animals. While some amount of injuries/mortalities are expected when handling wild animals, many of the incidents that have occurred are entirely preventable; the result of negligence, abusive capture techniques, or cruel handling practices employed by those contracted to conduct the roundups.

Thriving Natural Ecological Balance

This author, after thorough research has found no official definition of a “thriving natural ecological balance” (TNEB) given to the public by any government agency, especially the BLM or DOI. This becomes extremely significant, as this is what defines the measures used by the BLM to assess whether a TNEB exists. But not so ironic, without a formal definition TNEB criteria, or standards to assess TNEB, the BLM has an awkward discretion in determining if a TNEB exists or not. This provides the BLM the opportunity to make claims that a TNEB does not exist which are then difficult to challenge.

Further, it sets-up a definable illegal-aspect of fraud. Well defined within government procurement policy and law, (in author synoptic form here) that situations must develop within a well-defined parameter of management and actual operational aspects via pre-explained and well structured and objective plans; in another words, to actually explain in well-defined terms, the reasoning for not only an appropriate budget expense while using taxpayer dollars (often in the millions of dollars), but to summarize the necessity as well as the management principles to appeal to such an arrangement. Does it actually resolve a problem, or create new problems?

So in reality the TNEB becomes nothing more than Cart Blanc or a freestyle-spending of taxpayer money, because no objective is ever given on such false and undefined, lack of data procedure. Although, what we do discover is more problems, and not so surprising, cost taxpayers much more money; as well we cannot neglect the situation job-security for the managers of such cumbersome and non-factual circumstances – to simply spend taxpayer money even more freely, and with little to no transparency or explanation while doing so.

Facts and Data? Just immaterial to a BLM employee and their supervisory staff. No one is watching – because no on really knows what is the ongoing situation on Public Lands.

But if it was defined, then most often there would be the big question – Is this Legal and is it Needed? And most often the aspects and reasoning for a roundup would not be applicable, needed or required, or legal. But the aspect of the overabundance of cattle would become prevalent, would it not? Of course it would, because this is the only reality-fact of this entire circumstance, the cattle, the overall and factual reasoning toward the destruction of Public Lands.

The BLM claims that such removals are required to restore the “thriving natural ecological balance” and to permit “multiple-use” of the land. But the fact is the situation has always been questionable; especially when no legitimate facts or data is given for the extreme and costly roundups.

BLM DOI and Bad Science

The fact is the subject of cattle, or even the mention of cattle have been taken from any Range Management Research – or decision makers have been told to simply ignore the facts of the cattle and their destructive elements of grazing. Once again, these government agencies are responsible for spending large amounts of taxpayer money, in the $-millions, and for corrupt data, no data, bad science. Budgets are based on this information often within government procurement situations.

Bad Science + False information = Costly / Corrupt Decisions. There is a fact here though, the fact of no-resolution achieved. What follows is simply compounded – to cover-up a bad decision (incompetence actually) other programs such as PZP and breeding control started, costing taxpayers millions more in hidden agenda budgets, grants, and scholarships; which have become quite outstanding currently.

In one conversation we found a Contract Scientist, a PZP researcher, was asked to supply data from any long term studies he may have in regard to the use and safety, and future results to Wild Horses health, when administering PZP into their bodies. His response was simply, (in synoptic form here), “. . . sure we had the data in our heads, but no one wrote it down. But we know what it is we’re doing.”

This comment, he tried to make us believe, would resolve the “no data present” issue and cover over 30 years of no data – the PZP questionable today, and highly suspect in regard to unsafe or unwanted and extreme negative health situations – the data if accurate, would have pointed this out and prevention or No Sale to this government agency would have developed. Instead, it is based on false information as well as no information what so ever – so BLM incompetence strikes again, and again . . .

“. . . Though any effort to prevent pregnancy will result in an impact to individual animals, herd structure, and mare/stallion behavior, the vast majority of scientists have determined that those impacts are miniscule or inconsequential, and pale in comparison to the disruptive impacts of roundups and removals.” PZP research staff and principles

This statement brought to us by those who have no “long-term-data” on their research, and expect administering PZP via roundups to operate this way. Well, even this has been proven in error, and in accord with Agricultural Reports of horses going to slaughter in both Canada and Mexico (export data overwhelming) and directly related to the PZP added roundups situation and operations. We have found since the conception of this supposed “new” resolution to cover-up older cover-ups, more wild horses are going to slaughter than ever before – and those mares who received PZP injections, often do not make it back to Public Lands what so ever – rather many are simply sent to slaughter, as well as with stallions that are also rounded up during the PZP plan, simply loaded and taken directly to slaughter. (i.e. confirmed)

Currently, there is no way to check for the hazards of PZP, other than experiment on the Wild Horses, costing taxpayers $-millions of dollars more, even though the PZP program did fail in 1996 and for similar reasoning brought up here – bad data, no data, and incompetent handling of wild horses, and horses health and ecological systems placed into jeopardy.

One has got to suspect how costly the next situation will cost the taxpayers, to cover up the falsehoods of the PZP situation, that is covering up the falsehoods of the roundups situation, that is covering up the falsehoods of BLM personnel, who are in reality extremely incompetent and do not know much about wild horses or their band behaviors.

This is the way BLM operates. If the data not there, well, of course they know what they are doing, after all it is in their heads. The problem is the fact it is in their head, and the dollar signs for everyone involved are quite overwhelming at times – and while covering up this situation, they have also hidden the fact, due to no transparency, that none of those involved in the Wild Horse and Burro Program are really qualified to do so.

I think it legitimate to state, unequivocally, it is time for change – To actually get the BLM out of the wild horse management business – The taxpayer money extended to this government agency is simply a waste of money and waste of time – Many of us would like to see these situations investigated, as taxpayers also pay a substantial amount of money to be protected from criminal behavior within government agencies. . .


U.S. Congress, House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands, The Border: Are Environmental Laws and Regulation Impeding Security and Harming the Environment? testimony of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Deputy Chief Ronald Vitiello, 112t/Cong., 1stsess., April 15, 2011

P.L. 91-190; 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347.

For more information on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) compliance with NEPA and the environmental impact of its border security programs, see CBP, “SBI Environmental Documents,” border_security/otia/sbi_news/sbi_enviro_docs/.

A related issue is the authority, and litigation challenging the authority, to construct and maintain border barriers (the “fence”), including waivers from environmental protection statutes. However, this issue is not discussed in this report, because it is not limited to the federal lands. For information on issues related to the border barrier, see CRS Report
R42138, Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry, by Marc R. Rosenblum.

GAO-11-177, Border Security: Additional Actions Needed, p. 4.


GAO-11-177, Border Security: Additional Actions Needed, p. 15.

GAO-11-177, Border Security: Additional Actions Needed, p. 15.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fiscal Year 2012 President’s Budget: Budget Justification, p. 16-45.

This estimate of the deferred maintenance for roads reflects passenger-car roads. Including high-clearance roads, the total estimate of deferred maintenance for roads is $4.4 billion. Using this total roads estimate would yield approximately a $6.56 billion overall estimate of FS deferred maintenance.

This information was provided to CRS by the DOI Budget Office on May 10, 2011.

S.T. Dana and S.K. Fairfax, Forest and Range Policy: Its Development in the United States, 2nd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1980), pp. 158-164. 38

See, e.g.,

See Assessing Forest Ecosystem Health in the Inland West, ed. R.N. Sampson, D.L. Adams, and M. Enzer (New York: Food Products Press, 1994); see also CRS Report RS20822, Forest Ecosystem Health: An Overview, by Ross W. Gorte.


See CRS Report R41691, Forest Management for Resilience and Adaptation, by Ross W. Gorte.

For USFS: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Land Areas Report—As of Sept 30, 2010, Tables 1 and 4, Data reflect land within the National Forest System, including national forests, national grasslands, purchase units, land utilization projects, experimental
areas, and other areas.

For NPS: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service, Land Resources Division, National Park Service, Listing of Acreage by State, as of 12/31/2010, unpublished document. Data reflect federally owned lands managed by the NPS. For information on acreage by unit, see the NPS website, acreagemenu.cfm.

For FWS: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Annual Report of Lands Under Control of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as of September 30, 2010, Table 2, Data reflect all federally owned land over which the FWS has sole or primary jurisdiction.

For BLM: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Public Land Statistics, 2010, Table1-

For DOD: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary for Installations & Environment, Base Structure Report, Fiscal Year 2010 Baseline (A Summary of DoD’s Real Property Inventory), VIII. Total DoD Inventory, pp. DoD-36 to DoD-78,


Posted by on April 5, 2015 in Uncategorized


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,284 other followers